- From: Emily Stark <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2019 15:09:10 -0700
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/420@github.com>
こんにちはTAG! I'm requesting a TAG review of: - Name: Mixed Content Level 2 - Specification URL: https://w3c.github.io/webappsec-mixed-content/level2.html - Explainer (containing user needs and example code)¹: n/a as this is not a new web feature; please see Introduction of spec and advise if a separate explainer would be helpful - GitHub issues (if you prefer feedback filed there): https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-mixed-content/issues/ - Tests: https://cs.chromium.org/chromium/src/third_party/blink/web_tests/http/tests/mixed-autoupgrade/ (need to port to WPT) - Primary contacts (and their relationship to the specification): @estark37, @mikewest, @carlosjoan91 Further details: - Relevant time constraints or deadlines: Planning to ship in Chrome in early 2020, ideally need approvals in next 6 weeks - [X] I have read and filled out the [Self-Review Questionnare on Security and Privacy](https://www.w3.org/TR/security-privacy-questionnaire/). The [assessment is here](https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-mixed-content/blob/master/level2_security_privacy.markdown). - [X] I have reviewed the TAG's [API Design Principles](https://w3ctag.github.io/design-principles/) - The group where the work on this specification is: WebAppSec You should also know that... This change has been running in Chrome as an experiment for several months (currently at 50% of beta channel). We'd prefer the TAG provide feedback as (please select one): - [X] open issues in our GitHub repo for each point of feedback - [ ] open a single issue in our GitHub repo for the entire review - [ ] leave review feedback as a comment in this issue and @-notify [github usernames] -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/420
Received on Friday, 6 September 2019 22:09:36 UTC