Re: [whatwg/url] [Proposal] Specify a fragment-directive meant for UA instructions (#445)

Right, I don't think we'd want to change that. The interpretation of the fragment into  a directive would be left to HTML document loading. I think the only change we'd need in the URL spec would be to allow a '#' character in fragments as today this would be considered an invalid URL. e.g. `example.org##foo` is invalid. Otherwise I think a URL like that should behave as a fragment does today.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/url/issues/445#issuecomment-528344247

Received on Thursday, 5 September 2019 12:40:29 UTC