[w3ctag/design-reviews] Service Worker Scope Pattern Matching explainer (#417)

こんにちはTAG!

I'm requesting a TAG review of:

  - Name: Service Worker Scope Pattern Matching explainer
  - Specification URL: none yet
  - Explainer (containing user needs and example code)¹: https://github.com/wanderview/service-worker-scope-pattern-matching/blob/master/tag-security-privacy.md

  - GitHub issues (if you prefer feedback filed there): https://github.com/wanderview/service-worker-scope-pattern-matching/issues

  - Tests: None yet
  - Primary contacts (and their relationship to the specification): wanderview

Further details:

  - Relevant time constraints or deadlines: I plan to present at TPAC 2019, but implementation would not occur until later in Q4.
  - [x] I have read and filled out the [Self-Review Questionnare on Security and Privacy](https://www.w3.org/TR/security-privacy-questionnaire/). The [assessment is here](https://github.com/wanderview/service-worker-scope-pattern-matching/blob/master/tag-security-privacy.md).
  - [x] I have reviewed the TAG's [API Design Principles](https://w3ctag.github.io/design-principles/)
  - The group where the work on this specification is: Service Worker WG

We recommend the explainer to be in [Markdown](https://github.github.com/gfm/). On top of the [usual information expected in the explainer](https://w3ctag.github.io/explainers), it is strongly recommended to add:

  - Links to major pieces of multi-stakeholder review or discussion of this specification: 
  - Links to major unresolved issues or opposition with this specification:

You should also know that...

This is an early explainer review.  I anticipate changes based on Service Worker WG discussion at TPAC 2019.

We'd prefer the TAG provide feedback as (please select one):

  - [ ] open issues in our GitHub repo for each point of feedback
  - [x] open a single issue in our GitHub repo for the entire review
  - [ ] leave review feedback as a comment in this issue and @-notify [github usernames]

--------------------------

_Please preview the issue and check that the links work before submitting._ In particular, if anything links to a URL which requires authentication (e.g. Google document), please make sure anyone with the link can access the document.

¹ For background, see our [explanation of how to write a good explainer](https://w3ctag.github.io/explainers).


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/417