[w3ctag/design-reviews] EditContext API (#416)

こんにちはTAG!

I'm requesting a TAG review of:

  - Name: EditContext API
  - Specification URL: TBD
  - Explainer (containing user needs and example code)¹: [Explainer](https://github.com/MicrosoftEdge/MSEdgeExplainers/blob/master/EditContext/explainer.md)
  - GitHub issues (if you prefer feedback filed there): [Issues](https://github.com/MicrosoftEdge/MSEdgeExplainers/issues)
  - Tests: TBD
  - Primary contacts (and their relationship to the specification): [@snianu][@BoCupp-Microsoft][@gked]

Further details:

  - Relevant time constraints or deadlines: None.
  - [X] I have read and filled out the [Self-Review Questionnare on Security and Privacy](https://www.w3.org/TR/security-privacy-questionnaire/). The [assessment is here](https://github.com/MicrosoftEdge/MSEdgeExplainers/blob/master/EditContext/security-privacy.md).
  - [X] I have reviewed the TAG's [API Design Principles](https://w3ctag.github.io/design-principles/)
  - The group where the work on this specification is: TBD

We'd prefer the TAG provide feedback as (please select one):

  - [X] open issues in our GitHub repo for each point of feedback
  - [ ] open a single issue in our GitHub repo for the entire review
  - [ ] leave review feedback as a comment in this issue and @-notify [github usernames]

--------------------------

_Please preview the issue and check that the links work before submitting._ In particular, if anything links to a URL which requires authentication (e.g. Google document), please make sure anyone with the link can access the document.

¹ For background, see our [explanation of how to write a good explainer](https://w3ctag.github.io/explainers).


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/416