- From: Pine <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 13:03:47 -0700
- To: w3c/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 28 October 2019 20:04:21 UTC
> I would consider it a subset of what is currently in vscode. @daKmoR I'd say it's a superset. Think of it this way: - `slots`, `events` etc are specific to your WC. You compile them together into HTML, and browser render it. - Similarly, you compile `description`, `slots`, `events` into a Markdown and give that to VS Code as the `description` field, which renders that in its hover and auto-completion widgets. - I think keep the bridge just the Markdown formatted `description` is good. There's a 1-1 relationship between what data you feed VS Code & what you see on UI. Saying "now VS Code's custom data format would include `slots`, `events`, `cssProperties` and dictate how they should be rendered" limits your freedom to organize the message in the auto-completion widget, and these don't apply to scenarios outside WC. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/776#issuecomment-547121704
Received on Monday, 28 October 2019 20:04:21 UTC