- From: Alice <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 02:13:26 -0700
- To: w3c/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 16 October 2019 09:13:28 UTC
> it's also a bit problematic to hard code exactly the set of behaviors Safari has because we need to design this to be forward compatible. I don't follow - I'm suggesting the opposite of that: the developer chooses only "always tabbable" or "UA decides", and then the UA decides based on any set of signals it feels is appropriate. > I thought we didn't want to make decisions about non-AT related behavior based on ARIA? I wouldn't want to decide focusability wholesale (i.e. which of the four categories I laid out an element should fall into) based on ARIA; I think that it would be appropriate for a UA using ARIA as a signal as to how it determines the focus behaviour of an element which has already been determined to be user-focusable. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/762#issuecomment-542607331
Received on Wednesday, 16 October 2019 09:13:28 UTC