- From: Boris Zbarsky <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2019 10:21:40 -0700
- To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 2 October 2019 17:22:02 UTC
Alternately, we could eliminate FrozenArray altogether and do the "freeze and cache" thing via extended attributes on the type or attribute, I suppose. I'm not sure that's better than having a dedicated type, but it would make it clear that the underlying implementation sees a sequence. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/810#issuecomment-537594978
Received on Wednesday, 2 October 2019 17:22:02 UTC