Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Change 'CSS Modules' name to avoid webdev confusion (#843)

@gregwhitworth "CSS module script" seems fine, given this affects the specification only (i.e. docs). I have high confidence that implementors and first-adoptors will write blogs about this with introductions like this — because these people are good citizens and make the web better:

> CSS module scripts (inspired by but not to be confused with CSS Modules [link]) are...

I love the name because:

1) It's passably different short-term, while the distinction has to be made.

2) The phrase will absolutely collapse from CSS module scripts to CSS modules long-term, and that feels like the polyfill-to-standard succession we deserve.

Having said that "StyleSheet Modules" would accomplish (1) and (2) also. Maybe better, it would be less confusing short-term. But eventually, I'll just be saying it CSS Modules meaning "the standard".

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/843#issuecomment-537575910