Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] CSS intrinsic-size (#437)

I think from a TAG perspective this is fine.  I was a little concerned that the early proposals were too narrow (and creating a new CSS property for something very specific when it could have been more general), but what is now specified is now more general as I was hoping.

I did give some [additional feedback](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4229#issuecomment-555286700) from my perspective as a CSS WG participant, but I don't think of that as an issue that the TAG should be concerned about.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/437#issuecomment-555287126