- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 09:56:27 -0800
- To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 11 November 2019 17:56:29 UTC
Well, `Intl.NumberFormat.prototype.format`, per "jsidl". We also have a case that shows that allowing a union/overload will likely lead to APIs with implicit coercion of Number to BigInt, which is something TC39 does not want, as far as I know: https://github.com/WebAssembly/JS-BigInt-integration/issues/12. I don't think there's a way to enforce the difference through IDL. I guess you could try something along the lines of that when there's a union, the corresponding algorithm cannot contain a Number to BigInt operation, but try enforcing that realistically … -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/heycam/webidl/pull/525#issuecomment-552547256
Received on Monday, 11 November 2019 17:56:29 UTC