- From: hober <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2019 16:15:32 -0800
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 7 November 2019 00:15:34 UTC
> as you probably know, anything >= 33 bits can identify an individual on earth, and you likely need a lot less to identify a user on a particular site in a given 2 day window, so we only really start getting meaningful privacy protections if the impression metadata is reduced below 32 bits. […] > In this case in the design we chose 64 bits[…] So, by that logic, you don't believe your proposal gets meaningful privacy protection. Noted. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/418#issuecomment-550560600
Received on Thursday, 7 November 2019 00:15:34 UTC