Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Refinements and description of Service-Worker-Allowed. (#1409)

mattto commented on this pull request.



> @@ -2119,6 +2119,26 @@ spec: webappsec-referrer-policy; urlPrefix: https://w3c.github.io/webappsec-refe
     [=/Service workers=] enable this by allowing {{Cache|Caches}} to [=/fetch=] and cache off-origin items. Some restrictions apply, however. First, unlike same-origin resources which are managed in the {{Cache}} as {{Response}} objects whose corresponding [=Response/responses=] are <a>basic filtered response</a>, the objects stored are {{Response}} objects whose corresponding [=Response/responses=] are either <a>CORS filtered responses</a> or <a>opaque filtered responses</a>. They can be passed to {{FetchEvent/respondWith(r)|event.respondWith(r)}} method in the same manner as the {{Response}} objects whose corresponding [=Response/responses=] are <a>basic filtered responses</a>, but cannot be meaningfully created programmatically. These limitations are necessary to preserve the security invariants of the platform. Allowing {{Cache|Caches}} to store them allows applications to avoid re-architecting in most cases.
   </section>
 
+  <section>
+    <h3 id="path-restriction">Path restriction</h3>
+
+    *This section is non-normative.*
+
+    In addition to the [[#origin-restriction|origin restriction]], service workers are restricted by the [=url/path=] of the service worker script. For example, a service worker script at <code>https://www.example.com/~bob/sw.js</code> can be registered for the [=scope=] <code>https://www.example.com/~bob</code> but not for the scope <code>https://www.example.com</code> or <code>https://www.example.com/~alice</code>. This provides some protection for sites that host multiple-user content in separated directories on the same origin. However, the path restriction is not considered a hard security boundary, as only origins are. Sites are encouraged to use different origins to securely isolate segments of the site if appropriate.

Thanks, done.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/pull/1409#discussion_r288357902