Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Verifiable Credentials Data Model 1.0 (#343)

Hi all.  We've revisited this in our face-to-face in Reykjavik. And thanks for your extensive comments. From us: 

1. A lot of what you've described here is out of our purview (as per business take-up and market verticals).

   What is most relevant to us, @msporny is where you write: 

   > The thread that ties all of these use cases and organizations together is the Web. They use websites to issue, store, and present Verifiable Credentials. Many are defining Web-based/HTTP APIs for the protocols. 

   Would you like us to review those? It doesn't matter that they are in a community group; we look at web technologies from a number of forums.

2. It's hard for us to look at the data model in isolation. It may be fine, but it may have dependencies on the underlying web technologies or interact with other architectural issues. We'd like to understand the rest of the work before commenting further.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/343#issuecomment-494830503