- From: L. David Baron <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 May 2019 07:34:32 -0700
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 21 May 2019 14:34:55 UTC
> That "TAG vigilance" may be related to w3ctag/design-principles#41, which we need to address at some point... Though based on our discussions this morning about trying to avoid the TAG being a bottleneck for others: perhaps this is work that the TAG isn't the most suitable body to drive. In particular, it seems like perhaps some folks in the webappsec WG could take the lead in drafting something that explains how these pieces (sandbox, allow, other things mentioned in that issue) fit together and how new things are meant to be added to them. I think this is important because we'd like it to be clear how to add things to the platform -- and I think if others write such a document there are folks on the TAG who would be interested in reviewing it -- but maybe we should avoid giving you the impression that you should be waiting for us to write it! -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/339#issuecomment-494418112
Received on Tuesday, 21 May 2019 14:34:55 UTC