- From: L. David Baron <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 May 2019 06:37:07 -0700
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 21 May 2019 13:37:30 UTC
From [way earlier](https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/311#issuecomment-434623759): > What is the type relationship between Instant and DOMHighResTimeStamp/DOMTimeStamp? Do you envision those DOM types subclassing the new ones? Should they be convertable? Has there been a dicsussion about how IDL will translate them? I think there probably shouldn't be a relationship, since `DOMHighResTimeStamp` and maybe also `DOMTimeStamp` are (I think!?) mononically-increasing, even in the face of user-initiated or ntp-initiated adjustments to the system clock. (Though maybe `DOMTimeStamp` isn't... and if so, perhaps there should be a way to convert from `Instant`.) -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/311#issuecomment-494394383
Received on Tuesday, 21 May 2019 13:37:30 UTC