- From: Frederik Wessberg <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 May 2019 00:43:01 -0700
- To: whatwg/dom <dom@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 21 May 2019 07:43:23 UTC
@rniwa alright. To avoid stalling, how about we investigate whether synchronous reactions are feasible first? @caridy, you say that you would like get feedback from implementors in regards to the perf implications of sync reactions. I think that is a great idea since it helps us understand if a sync solution is feasible. If implementors will simply block this proposal out of performance concerns and lessons learned from Mutation Events, that would be a shame. Is there anyone reading this who can chime in here or page someone who can? I think a way forward for us is to first understand what we can all agree on in regards to goals/non-goals. Is everone in agreement that: - We're concerned with the connectedness of any node, and not just elements? - We want multiple observers to be able to observe the connectedness of a node simultaneously? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/533#issuecomment-494277811
Received on Tuesday, 21 May 2019 07:43:23 UTC