- From: Jake Archibald <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 05:58:08 -0700
- To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 20 May 2019 12:58:30 UTC
> Also, top-level await would not be protected by a `waitUntil()`. In general we probably couldn't automatically keep it alive because then it would become an abuse vector. I think we could work around that. We know what event we're starting up for, and we could take any start up time away from that event when/if we get that far. Similar to if you've got a sync infinite loop or some other expensive code at the top level. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1407#issuecomment-493976263
Received on Monday, 20 May 2019 12:58:30 UTC