- From: Ms2ger <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 02:55:20 -0700
- To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 14 May 2019 09:55:43 UTC
Ms2ger commented on this pull request. > -named "<code>entries</code>", "<code>forEach</code>", -"<code>has</code>", "<code>keys</code>", -"<code>size</code>", or "<code>values</code>", -or have any [=inherited interfaces=] -that have [=members=] with these names. -Read–write setlike interfaces must not -have any [=attributes=] -or [=constants=] named -"<code>add</code>", "<code>clear</code>", -or "<code>delete</code>", or have any [=inherited interfaces=] -that have [=attributes=] or [=constants=] with these names. - -Note: Operations named "<code>add</code>", "<code>clear</code>", -or "<code>delete</code>" are allowed on read–write setlike +Setlike interfaces and their [=inherited interfaces=] must not have any [=regular operations=], +[=regular attributes=] or [=constants=] named This forbids ```webidl interface A { void entries(); }; interface B : A { readonly setlike<long>; }; ``` but not ```webidl interface A { readonly setlike<long>; }; interface B : A { void entries(); }; ``` Should it? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/heycam/webidl/pull/726#pullrequestreview-237141193
Received on Tuesday, 14 May 2019 09:55:43 UTC