Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Web Publications review (#344)

@mattgarrish was mostly thinking that maintaining parity would be useful to avoid collision caused by having separate registries--i.e. so there isn't a later `<link rel="cover">` (or `pagelist`, etc) which differs in definition from the one's we plan to register at IANA.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/344#issuecomment-490167431

Received on Tuesday, 7 May 2019 17:09:36 UTC