- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 07 May 2019 06:28:26 -0700
- To: whatwg/dom <dom@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 7 May 2019 13:28:48 UTC
I found https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26183#c20 and also https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5851. The general gist is that something might be feasible, but we don't want to add named string properties (which `iterable<Node>` would) as they'd clash with the named getters the object already has. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/757#issuecomment-490079317
Received on Tuesday, 7 May 2019 13:28:48 UTC