- From: Matt Garrish <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 06 May 2019 18:26:45 +0000 (UTC)
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 6 May 2019 18:27:09 UTC
I believe the `rel` issue has been resolved in the specification as of a [change made last week](https://github.com/w3c/wpub/pull/432). As we are planning to register the three relations, there was no need to express them as URLs and they are now token values. The `rel` property for LinkedObject is also not an equivalent of the HTML `link` element, so I don't believe there's any issue with our also recommending URLs for relations that are not going to be registered. I'm not sure what the answer is to whether the three new relations should also be registered in the microformats wiki. That all depends on whether the group thinks there will be a need to identify these resources in `link` elements within the HTML. They could be useful for general use, but it's a bit out of scope of the specification proper. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/344#issuecomment-489724408
Received on Monday, 6 May 2019 18:27:09 UTC