- From: Alice <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 10:57:23 +0000 (UTC)
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 29 March 2019 10:58:14 UTC
Had a chat offline with @annevk and he clarified that it was less an objection and more of a philosophical query, which led to https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3778 In terms of this specific case, the cat is really out of the bag in terms of `:content` being exposed in the accessibility tree, and the responses to Rob's tweet shows that authors are looking for a way to fine-tune that content. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/351#issuecomment-477956615
Received on Friday, 29 March 2019 10:58:14 UTC