- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2019 17:39:16 +0000 (UTC)
- To: whatwg/dom <dom@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <whatwg/dom/pull/732/review/215166470@github.com>
annevk commented on this pull request. > @@ -2389,12 +2389,10 @@ of a <var>node</var> into a <var>parent</var> before a <var>child</var>, run the </ol> <p><a lt="Other applicable specifications">Specifications</a> may define -<dfn export id=concept-node-insert-ext>insertion steps</dfn> for all or some <a for=/>nodes</a>. The -algorithm is passed <var ignore>insertedNode</var>, as indicated in the <a for=/>insert</a> -algorithm below. -<!-- See https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/34#issuecomment-125571750 for why we might need to - adjust this further based on the requirements of the script element. There might be other ways - to define that though as Olli suggests, so leaving that out for now. --> +<dfn export id=concept-node-insert-ext>insertion steps</dfn> or +<dfn export id=concept-node-children-added>children added steps</dfn> for all or some So I'm pretty sure implementations have a "children changed steps" callback. Removing children does not affect this? What if someone modifies a `Text` node directly? I'm pretty sure we should merge "children added steps" and "child text content change steps". The main place that might require some detailed tests around this is the `style` element. As far as I can tell it's mostly not observable for `textarea`. I could write some tests around this if that would help. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/dom/pull/732#pullrequestreview-215166470
Received on Friday, 15 March 2019 17:39:38 UTC