- From: Jake Archibald <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2019 04:14:26 -0800
- To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <whatwg/fetch/pull/853/review/211744386@github.com>
jakearchibald approved this pull request. Aside from the nits, I'm happy with this. I agree that "no-cache local only flag" is a confusing name, but I can't think of a better one. Maybe "prevent no-cache cache-control header modification flat"? It's a bit long, but it says what it does. > @@ -1896,6 +1908,16 @@ is a <a>filtered response</a> whose <li><p>Return <var>newResponse</var>. </ol> +<p>A <dfn export id=concept-fresh-response>fresh response</dfn> is a <a for=/>response</a> where Remove "where" > @@ -1404,10 +1407,16 @@ Unless stated otherwise, it is unset. <div class="note no-backref"> <dl> <dt>"<code>default</code>" - <dd><a for=/>Fetch</a> will inspect the HTTP cache on the way to the network. - If there is a fresh response it will be used. If there is a stale response a conditional request - will be created, and a normal request otherwise. It then updates the HTTP cache with the response. - [[!HTTP]] [[!HTTP-SEMANTICS]] [[!HTTP-COND]] [[!HTTP-CACHING]] [[!HTTP-AUTH]] + <dd><a for=/>Fetch</a> will inspect the HTTP cache on the way to the network: + <ol> + <li>If the HTTP cache contains a matching <a>fresh response</a> it will be returned. + <li>If the HTTP cache contains a matching <a>stale-while-revalidate response</a> it will be returned, + and a conditional network fetch will be made to update the entry in the HTTP cache. + <li>If the HTTP cache contains a matching <a>stale response</a>, a conditional network will be created + and returned. + <li>Otherwise, a non-conditioanl network fetch will be returned. "conditional" -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/853#pullrequestreview-211744386
Received on Thursday, 7 March 2019 12:14:49 UTC