- From: Asa Kusuma <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 13:13:52 -0700
- To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 31 July 2019 20:14:14 UTC
I interpreted the proposal the same way @mkruisselbrink did. In other words, either the service worker code itself can add the `Service-Worker-Fetch-Scope` response header, or the server can add the header when providing a page to be cached. I like the proposal. It would be nice if there was a similar lightweight API that allowed bypassing the service worker for navigation requests too. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1454#issuecomment-517002682
Received on Wednesday, 31 July 2019 20:14:14 UTC