- From: Jeffrey Posnick <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 07:02:54 -0700
- To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 26 July 2019 14:03:53 UTC
It's also worth reading https://web.dev/google-search-sw/#problem:-experiments-and-dynamism, which describes the approach the Google Search team took when implementing a service worker: they took advantage of the control offered by dynamically generating a service worker script server-side, based on the incoming HTTP request. There's an extra burden of maintaining the server-side code, and it's a different approach when you start thinking about using the service worker API "dynamically," but it does give you the most flexibility. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1453#issuecomment-515465943
Received on Friday, 26 July 2019 14:03:53 UTC