Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] WebSocketStream (#394)

If it were me, any work in this area might want to be chartered alongside (as in the same group) as what does WebTransport.  Assuming that both are done, that is.  I would want the same API in both cases.

As for stream of streams, we don't want to expose the GC, so we would need to have each body drained.  Most of the accessors aren't a problem, but if you get a stream, then that stream would need to be exhausted before the next message can appear.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/394#issuecomment-513345553