Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Editorial: Add a missing ref-name for requestPointerLock method (#48)

Sounds great. Happy to review changes once new params are added. Looking forward to discussing those. 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/pointerlock/pull/48#issuecomment-511634581

Received on Tuesday, 16 July 2019 02:02:42 UTC