Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Editorial: Change the ref-name of the functions (#48)

> hmm... convention is to have methods as "foo()" throughout the spec. Are you sure you want to change them?

Convention through out this spec or across W3C specs? At least I know we haven't followed this in PointerEvent spec. Is that written somewhere so I can take a look and see how it generally applies? How does that apply to the functions with parameter? Should we just drop the parameters in links or should we mention them all every time in a link?

> Added data-link-for="Element" to the closest <p>, so hopefully now should link ok.
Yup. This fixed it. Thanks



-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/pointerlock/pull/48#issuecomment-511625223