Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Editorial: Change the ref-name of the functions (#48)

@marcoscaceres There was another place in the spec that was referring to **requestPointerLock** but with no link at the moment.
Context:
_... used to enter fullscreen it is sufficient for a subsequent requestPointerLock._

When I change that to `<a>requestPointerLock</a>` ReSpec complains that it cannot find the reference. Do you know why? Is that a bug in ReSpec or am I missing something?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/pointerlock/pull/48#issuecomment-511473079