Re: [whatwg/dom] MutationObserver needs an equivalent of disconnected & connected callbacks (#533)

> Sounds great. Wouldn't it be sufficient with a simple boolean `connected` which is `true|false`?

Sorry, I wasn't thinking through. We could just add new mutation record types like `connected` / `disconnected` and not even add a boolean.


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/533#issuecomment-459271663