- From: Andy Earnshaw <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 15:03:34 +0000 (UTC)
- To: w3c/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 28 January 2019 15:03:57 UTC
@rniwa in order to solve the override problem, what if a new CSS function were introduced to allow an author to define permitted styles for an element? e.g. ```css :host { display: allow(block, inline-block, none); writing-mode: allow(horizontal-tb); /* special interaction with minmax() ? */ --column-width: allow(minmax(10px, 300px)); } ``` The function could be special-cased to only be valid in the UA origin (to be compatible with @tabatkins's suggestion of making the styles work like UA defaults), but override even `!important` declarations where the property is not one of the permitted values. The first value in the list would be the default. This way, you don't need a new stacking order and you can define a subset of permitted values for the props that matter. It would also provide reasoning for UA elements that behave this way already, such as setting `display: inline` on a `<textarea>` as I mentioned before, and would improve tooling by, for example, only showing those permitted values when interacting with the properties in the dev tools. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/468#issuecomment-458165875
Received on Monday, 28 January 2019 15:03:57 UTC