Re: [whatwg/fetch] Add Async Stale While Revalidate Handling (#853)

@dtapuska if standard processing occurs, the current PR is wrong, right? It invokes an algorithm that doesn't handle redirects.

The naming comment is about "async" in the new enum value. Fetching is already asynchronous for all intents and purposes so this name is rather confusing.

As for the service worker, we don't have many fetches that can bypass it, so the problem would be that now there is a way and the service worker can do nothing about it. That breaks a design decision around service workers.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/853#issuecomment-458161146