- From: Kinuko Yasuda <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 21:10:32 -0800
- To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 22 January 2019 05:10:54 UTC
kinu commented on this pull request. > @@ -1542,6 +1549,11 @@ whose <a for=request>destination</a> is "<code>audio</code>", "<code>audioworkle "<code>script</code>", "<code>style</code>", "<code>track</code>", "<code>video</code>", "<code>xslt</code>", or the empty string. +<p>A <dfn export>stale permitting subresource request</dfn> is a <a for=/>request</a> +whose <a for=request>destination</a> is "<code>font</code>", "<code>image</code>", +"<code>script</code>", "<code>style</code>", "<code>xslt</code>", or +<a for=request>initiator</a> is "<code>prefetch</code>". Allowing stale request for prefetch feels slightly odd to me because responses for prefetch won't be used downstream (per definition). This one can just trigger a revalidation therefore the next request (the real one that wants to use the response) could use a fresh resource? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/853#pullrequestreview-194838962
Received on Tuesday, 22 January 2019 05:10:54 UTC