- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 08:29:29 +0000 (UTC)
- To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 11 January 2019 08:29:52 UTC
Not creating it seems likely, but otherwise checking if arg3 != undefined, then arg1 != undefined, would seem reasonable. However, thinking about that some more, with IDL `foo(undefined, undefined, undefined)` would end up with the 3-argument version due to the arguments not being marked optional... I guess I'm no longer quite so sure it makes sense to go through the trouble of changing this, unless there's other reasons to make changes to overloading. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/581#issuecomment-453427592
Received on Friday, 11 January 2019 08:29:52 UTC