- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2019 10:58:12 -0800
- To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 9 January 2019 18:58:33 UTC
annevk commented on this pull request. > @@ -8171,8 +8171,8 @@ a reference to the same object that the IDL value represents. 1. Set |offset| to the value of |O|’s \[[ByteOffset]] [=internal slot=]. 1. Set |length| to the value of |O|’s \[[ByteLength]] [=internal slot=]. 1. Otherwise, set |length| to the value of |O|’s \[[ArrayBufferByteLength]] [=internal slot=]. - 1. If <a abstract-op>IsDetachedBuffer</a>(|O|), then - [=ECMAScript/throw=] a {{ECMAScript/TypeError}}. + 1. If <a abstract-op>IsDetachedBuffer</a>(|arrayBuffer|) is <emu-val>true</emu-val>, then + return a reference to or a copy of (as required) the empty byte sequence. There's two ways to invoke the algorithm and the algorithm is expected depending on how it's invoked to either return a reference to bytes or a copy thereof. So this matches the existing expectations of callers and the existing way things are phrased for return values. I agree that this could be done in a somewhat cleaner way, but that seems like a follow-up of sorts as it affects the whole algorithm (and potentially callers). -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/heycam/webidl/pull/605#discussion_r246488749
Received on Wednesday, 9 January 2019 18:58:33 UTC