Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Vehicle Information Service Specification (VISS) CR (#234)

Hi @hadleybeeman,

 HNY to you too. VISS is in CR are we get more implementation experience. There are several known and rumored implementations: Melco, ACCESS+KDDI, Renesas, Bosch, Visteon+JLR and Volvo offhand as either PoC, dev environments, or production. We want to get feedback and possibly make revisions before finalizing. With a significant implementation heading toward production and an accompanying report expected we will likely try to advance to PR in the comming months.

The Auto WG is focusing more on a next generation with additional capabilities and desire to handle multiple protocols. @ylafon did meet with us at TPAC and dissuaded us from trying to go protocol-less as proven to be problematic in the past (SOAP/Web Services cited as example) and to keep an eye on emerging changes to HTTP.

For now I believe we are set with the TAG and have had prompt feedback post TPAC on gh issue we pinged @ylafon on.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/234#issuecomment-452747139