- From: Marijn Kruisselbrink <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2019 14:34:13 -0800
- To: whatwg/url <url@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <whatwg/url/pull/371/review/190490371@github.com>
mkruisselbrink commented on this pull request. > @@ -1120,15 +1120,13 @@ resource the <a for=/>URL</a>'s other components identify. It is initially null. <p id=non-relative-flag>A <a for=/>URL</a> also has an associated <dfn export for=url>cannot-be-a-base-URL flag</dfn>. It is initially unset. -<p>A <a for=/>URL</a> also has an associated <dfn export for=url id=concept-url-object>object</dfn> -that is null, a {{Blob}} object, or a {{MediaSource}} object. It is initially null. -[[!FILEAPI]] -[[!MEDIA-SOURCE]] - -<p class="note no-backref">At this point this is used primarily to support -"<code>blob</code>" <a for=/>URLs</a>, but others can be added going forward, hence -"object". +<p>A <a for=/>URL</a> also has an associated <dfn export for=url id=concept-url-blob-entry>blob entry</dfn> +that is either null or a <a>blob URL entry</a>. It is initially null. With the name change it's obvious that references to the old term need to be updated somehow. If I had just kept the old term it would be much harder to figure out where references to the old definition exist that now need to be updated because it is a different type. Also it seemed weird to be talking about a URL's object's object, but that's pretty minor of course. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/url/pull/371#discussion_r246176787
Received on Tuesday, 8 January 2019 22:34:36 UTC