- From: Alex Russell <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2019 21:45:29 +0000 (UTC)
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 8 January 2019 21:45:51 UTC
The argument that "we can't figure out why a web developer would ever want something" (a something that works against our design principles and general design goals) is not particularly compelling. The point of extensibility is to enable developers to do the set of things we *haven't* yet thought of, rather than to presume that we're omniscient. The argument from consistency, at least, trumps one-off restrictions and design oddities. Let's make this subclassable. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/282#issuecomment-452463065
Received on Tuesday, 8 January 2019 21:45:51 UTC