- From: Amelia Bellamy-Royds <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2019 08:44:17 -0800
- To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 8 January 2019 16:44:38 UTC
> I'm worried about feature detection. [ @jakearchibald re using a configuration object instead of classes and method calls] What if the API contained a setConfig / getConfig pair, and the getConfig drops any unrecognized properties? So the initial server worker script could run a quick test case and then decide which configuration file to load. Alternatively, the setConfig method could take an options parameter that defined error-checking rules: does the setter throw an error for unrecognized configuration rules/properties, or does it silently drop them, or make that rule trigger the service worker, or…? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1373#issuecomment-452367625
Received on Tuesday, 8 January 2019 16:44:38 UTC