- From: Mike West <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2019 06:51:21 -0800
- To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 4 January 2019 14:51:42 UTC
> Allowing them gives out similar functionality as on the other two browsers. Thanks for checking, @Osintopsec! > Yeah, I was afraid of that, but it's still rather unclean to throw after side effects for the caller have happened, if you allow me to compare a fetch with a function call. I agree that it would be good in the abstract to change browsers to reject the cookie if the request is rejected. To do so in Chrome, we'd need to do a good deal of refactoring in our network stack, and do whatever measurement work was necessary to convince ourselves that we could make this change without breaking too much. Is there a risk here beyond the uncleanliness of the result? If not, I can think of more than a few places I'd like to clean up before coming to this issue. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/855#issuecomment-451464605
Received on Friday, 4 January 2019 14:51:42 UTC