- From: Asa Kusuma <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 22:01:05 +0000 (UTC)
- To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 19 February 2019 22:01:30 UTC
> The worst thing about blindly calling skipWaiting() is that it appears to work perfectly at first, but it results in bugs in production that are difficult to understand and reproduce. Perhaps I'm missed something, but the article doesn't seem to be specific about the bugs. I think https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/863 would be a better solution to the problem of cache misses for the v1 tab. Mainly because the proposed "virtual" worker seems like a huge amount of added complexity for browser implementations. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1389#issuecomment-465328602
Received on Tuesday, 19 February 2019 22:01:30 UTC