- From: Dan Clark <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 15:35:56 -0800
- To: w3c/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 15 February 2019 23:36:18 UTC
I don't have any particular objection here, I just haven't made the change yet because there are still some aspects of it I'm pondering. For example, what does HTML Module Record's InitializeEnvironment() look like when it lives in the HTML spec? Is it allowed to just call ES algorithms like CreateMutableBinding() (to prepare the module's default export) or does there need to be some special handoff between the specs for stuff like that? If so, what should that look like? I hadn't yet seen the [WebAssembly ESM integration spec draft](https://littledan.github.io/esm-integration/#esm-integration) but this looks like it will be a helpful reference so I'm reading it now. Is the discussion about moving Source Text Module Records into HTML a public one that you could link me to? I'd be interested in following that. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/783#issuecomment-464247535
Received on Friday, 15 February 2019 23:36:18 UTC