Re: [whatwg/encoding] Make decode() and encodeInto() accept SharedArrayBuffer-backed views (#172)

If the most obvious path to for-sure non-UB implementation is to make the DOM code use a presently-slower-than-`memcpy` replacement for `memcpy` with an intermediate buffer, is there any reason why that would be better than having the JS glue code make the intermediate copy?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/encoding/issues/172#issuecomment-462278453