- From: Mike West <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 00:37:59 -0800
- To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 11 February 2019 08:38:21 UTC
> That number is incredibly high. Sadly you don't seem to count `application/json`? Would this also include no Content-Type? Yes. "Other" is everything else, including `application/json` and the empty string. > Would you assume that breaking cross-origin scripts would usually be less of a problem, assuming that a lot of those are tracking scripts? Yes, that's exactly my intuition. Hence the separate metrics. :) > I am still surprised that the difference seems so high, but I don't have a good intuition on how those two measurements compare. I can imagine that Chromium's page-views-based number would look much higher than Mozilla's script-load-based number if there are a small number of very widely used scripts with incorrect MIME types. Facebook was in this category, as is VK, and a zillion ad scripts. I think it's worth experimenting in this direction, and explicitly allowing `text/html` and `application/json` probably takes care of a large chunk of the potential breakage, but I think it'll be necessary to do some more research before I'd be able to convince Blink folks to ship this kind of change. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/870#issuecomment-462250891
Received on Monday, 11 February 2019 08:38:21 UTC