- From: Daniel Ehrenberg <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2019 14:16:13 -0800
- To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 7 February 2019 22:16:37 UTC
littledan commented on this pull request.
>
1. Assert: |interface| is [=exposed=] in |realm|.
+ 1. Let prototype be the [=interface prototype object=] for |interface| in
+ |realm|.
+ 1. If |newTarget| is provided, then:
+ 1. Issue: If we just pass {{NewTarget}} through in a constructor, would this not
+ always be defined (sometimes to the [=interface object=] itself)?
+ 1. Let |newTargetPrototype| be [=?=] [$Get$](|newTarget|, "prototype").
To clarify, WebKit basically doesn't support subclassing URL even in the narrow `new.target` sense (ignoring the edge-casey fallback behavior):
```js
> class MyUrl extends URL { }
< undefined
> new MyUrl("file:///foo").constructor
< function URL() {
[native code]
}
```
Choosing one and writing tests will be a big help! But we do have 2/3 already supporting subclassing URL, so I think we're pretty safe to standardize that part.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/pull/635#discussion_r254888643
Received on Thursday, 7 February 2019 22:16:37 UTC