- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2019 08:26:48 +0000 (UTC)
- To: whatwg/encoding <encoding@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 7 February 2019 08:27:10 UTC
Welcome @juj and others. https://whatwg.org/working-mode and https://whatwg.org/faq#adding-new-features might help provide some additional context, though I think we have enough to move forward here. For SAB, is the copy that https://encoding.spec.whatwg.org/#dom-textdecoder-decode makes acceptable? If not, we'd somehow have to make decoding robust against input changing, right? It's not clear that's desirable. Either way, that would require a fair number of tests. For scanning, we could add something to https://encoding.spec.whatwg.org/#textdecodeoptions API-wise. I'm not sure if encoding libraries expose such primitives though, but if not they could be added I suppose. cc @hsivonen -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/encoding/issues/172#issuecomment-461327277
Received on Thursday, 7 February 2019 08:27:10 UTC