- From: Daniel Appelquist <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2019 23:22:35 -0800
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 7 February 2019 07:22:56 UTC
Some discussion again on the use of the term "trusted" and how over-loaded this term is. @dbaron suggested that "policy-check types" might be better. @lknik suggsted "safe-to-consume". @slightlyoff suggested "validated". In any case, even if you stick with "trusted" I feel the document should explain the scope of the use of the term "trusted" - trusted in what sense - as a specific sub-section of the explainer. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/198#issuecomment-461313122
Received on Thursday, 7 February 2019 07:22:56 UTC