- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2019 15:54:51 -0800
- To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 6 February 2019 23:55:12 UTC
I'd be very happy to see constructors become normal methods. While I lean slightly towards calling them by the class's name, as that's how you actually call them, I'm sympathetic to the "just do it like Javascript" naming method (tho that was, I presume, at least partially motivated by the existence of anonymous classes, which WebIDL doesn't have). -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/636#issuecomment-461235908
Received on Wednesday, 6 February 2019 23:55:12 UTC