- From: Domenic Denicola <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2019 13:16:34 -0800
- To: whatwg/encoding <encoding@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 6 February 2019 21:16:56 UTC
> .decodeRange(ArrayBuffer|SharedArrayBuffer|TypedArrayView, startIndex, [optional: maxElementsToRead]) Note that this style of (ArrayBuffer, startIndex, length) is exactly a TypedArray, and consensus has been to use Typed Arrays for this API design in the past. See #69 and https://esdiscuss.org/topic/idiomatic-representation-of-buffer-bytesread . So, that aspect of your before/after code samples would stay the same; you'd still use subarray() with any new APIs we add. Separately, I don't understand how you find the null byte in your second code example. Are you suggesting decodeRange treat null bytes specially? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/encoding/issues/172#issuecomment-461190551
Received on Wednesday, 6 February 2019 21:16:56 UTC